jadensababe505 jadensababe505
  • 22-05-2018
  • Social Studies
contestada

When warning users about the dangers of products, writers should avoid using mandatory language such as must and shall?

Respuesta :

andriansp andriansp
  • 31-05-2018
I believe the answer is: False

Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

HELP ME CHECK MY ANSWER PLEASE!!!
What does jousts mean?
Which process is responsible for the greatest loss of energy from Earth’s surface into space on a clear night? (1) condensation (3) radiation (2) conduction (4)
While walking along the shore of a lake Travis felt a cold breeze. What type of heat energy transfer is this an example of? _________________ Explain why : __
Why did Mesopotamian priests have the power they did? a. They could communicate directly with gods. b. They were thought to predict the future. c. They helped t
What is the size range for materials produced to be considered nanoscale?
A function is created to represent the costs of living per person in the family. What restrictions would be made to the domain?
What time is 7 1/2 hours before 2:12 AM?
in a classroom, 1/6 of the students are wearing blue shirts and 2/3 are wearing white shirts. there are 36 students in the class. how many students are wearing
Is the group of words a simple sentence, a compound sentence, a run-on sentence, or a sentence fragment? Exercising at the gym, the fancy new machines with th