squiddan24 squiddan24
  • 22-09-2020
  • History
contestada

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians

Respuesta :

chickenbutt787
chickenbutt787 chickenbutt787
  • 22-09-2020

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

Answer Link
1047654
1047654 1047654
  • 26-08-2021

Answer:

the answer is D.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Why did some American leaders oppose the idea of declaring independence? (Select all that apply.) A. They were afraid they would no longer be able to write lett
Can someone help me and solve this in a good way it’s really urgent
30 ounces = how many pounds and ounces
Which type of text tells you how to do something? a. persuasive b. narrative c. procedural d. expository
To help give money to the homeless Alaska made an organization to spread awareness on homelessness and poverty for every new member(shown above)needs to pay a f
I’m the three domain system which of the following domains includes organisms from more than one kingdom
What was the reason for most of the disputes between the settlers and the american indians
Please help on this one ?
The Crusades were a series of religious wars fought by Christian and Muslim soldiers between 1096 and 1270 A.D. What effects did the Crusades have on Europe and
the highest court between federal and state