lomllili1
lomllili1 lomllili1
  • 22-06-2017
  • History
contestada

How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

Respuesta :

hernandezchanel
hernandezchanel hernandezchanel
  • 22-06-2017
It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.
Answer Link
holesstanham
holesstanham holesstanham
  • 05-07-2019

One of the most important reasons why a historian might benefit from a secondary source when studying a particular event is because the use of a secondary source allows the historian to avoid the need to look back at the primary source. This is because an expert has already studied it, and published it, so that other historians can rely on it. In this way, a lot of money and effort can be saved.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

i am detained how will i be able to get out?
Life is real! Life is earnest! And the grave is not its goal; Dust thou art, to dust returnest, Was not spoken of the soul. How does this stanza express an opti
B.B.ghdedfggggnmngffdgbh
Which of the following statements about entropy is true? a. Entropy increases going from one trophic level to another. b. Increases in entropy lead to reversibl
I need help with that please!!!
W is how many units?
please help me thanks!
You have a table that shows a pattern. Describe two ways that you could find the 15th entry in the table.
What expression represents the phrase the cost of a pounds of apples at $1.69 per pound
How did Dobzhansky and Mayr explain the origin of species? It happens through adaptation by natural selection. It happens through sympatric speciation. It